Home
UK House of Lords Slams CAB3
- Details
- Written by: Hansard Reports - 15th April 2026
- Category: CAB3
- Hits: 10
UK House of Lords Slams Zimbabwe’s Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 as “Anti-Democratic” and “Profoundly Undemocratic”
London, 16 April 2026: - Full WEB LINK HERE
— In a significant intervention yesterday (15 April 2026), members of the UK House of Lords strongly criticised Zimbabwe’s proposed Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 3) Bill 2026 (CAB3), describing key elements as anti-democratic.
During an oral question session, Baroness Kate Hoey asked what discussions the UK Government had held with Harare over changes that would allow President Emmerson Mnangagwa to stand for a third term. She went further in her follow-up:
“Does he realise that the constitutional changes proposed will mean that the people of Zimbabwe will no longer elect their president, the electoral commission will be abolished, judicial appointments will become very unsafe, and there will be many more changes, all of which are anti-democratic?”
Baroness Hoey also highlighted ongoing;
“brutality, beatings, torture and imprisonment” against opposition figures and civil society, calling on the UK to speak out more strongly against what she described as the
“tyranny of the ZANU-PF regime.”
Lord Callanan (Conservative) echoed the criticism, stating:
“These changes are profoundly undemocratic, extending the current presidential mandate and abolishing the elections…”
Lord Bruce of Bennachie (Liberal Democrat) added that ZANU-PF’s justification for the changes showed
“utter contempt for democracy”.
The government minister, Lord Lemos, acknowledged serious concerns. He noted that the UK Ambassador had raised the issues directly with Zimbabwe’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs the previous day. He agreed that the public consultations had been “highly managed” with limited space for dissenting voices, and stressed that constitutional reform must be “inclusive, transparent, and fully consistent with democratic principles and the rule of law.”
However, the minister repeatedly emphasised that constitutional amendments remain a sovereign matter for Zimbabwe, while pointing to ongoing UK engagement with civil society and stakeholders.
Key Provisions of CAB3 Under Fire
The bill, gazetted in February 2026, proposes among other things:
- Replacing direct popular election of the President with election by a joint sitting of Parliament.
- Extending presidential, parliamentary, and local authority terms from 5 to 7 years (potentially extending the current term to 2030).
- Abolishing or weakening key independent institutions, including changes to the Electoral Commission and judicial appointments.
- Other structural shifts that critics say consolidate executive power.
Public hearings on the bill took place in late March/early April 2026 amid reports of restricted debate and intimidation
DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION
- Details
- Written by: Henry Itayi Makambe
- Category: Corruption News
- Hits: 129
ZIMBABWE WlLL NOT BE SILENCED: DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION
On 21 April 2026 Zimbabweans will rise to say NO to constitutional manipulation and YES to democracy
The proposed amendments known as CAB3 are not just legal changes -- They are a direct threat to our Constitution, our freedoms and the future of our nation.
They risk extending power beyond the will of the people and weakening the very institutions meant to protect us.
We refuse to accept this.
Zimbabwe's Constitution was built through the voices of its people. It must not be reshaped to some political interests.
- Term limits matter.
- Accountability matters.
- Our votes matter.
Across the country and beyond citizens are speaking out despite fear, despite intimidation.
Because this is bigger than politics This is about justice.
This is about protecting the principle of one person one vote
On this day we will deliver a petition that carries one clear message
- -No to dictatorship
- -No to constitutional abuse
- -Yes to democracy
- -Yes to the will of the people
This is a call to every Zimbabwean. Stand up.
Speak out. Be counted
The future of Zimbabwe cannot be decided in silence
Zimbabwe’s Democracy Is Being Rewritten
- Details
- Written by: Kelvin Mhlanga
- Category: Corruption News
- Hits: 611
Zimbabwe’s Democracy Is Being Rewritten — And The People Are Being Written Out
Zimbabwe is not witnessing reform. It is witnessing consolidation.
The ruling party, ZANU-PF, is pushing constitutional changes that would extend presidential terms and potentially remove the people’s direct right to elect their president. These proposals are framed as structural adjustments. In reality, they strengthen executive power at a time when democratic safeguards should be reinforced. Extending presidential terms from five to seven years potentially keeping Emmerson Mnangagwa in office until 2030 weakens one of democracy’s core protections: term limits. Term limits exist to prevent power from becoming permanent. When leaders begin adjusting those limits while in office, it raises legitimate concerns about motive.
Even more alarming is the proposal to shift presidential elections from citizens to Parliament. In a legislature dominated by the ruling party, this would effectively remove millions of Zimbabweans from directly choosing their leader. A president selected by politicians instead of voters changes the very nature of accountability but constitutional amendments are only part of the concern. Critics and civil society groups have repeatedly raised questions about the independence of state institutions, particularly the judiciary. Allegations of political influence over judges and key administrative officials have persisted for years. While direct evidence is often difficult to access in a constrained environment, the perception alone damages public trust.
- When court decisions consistently align with ruling party interests in highly political cases, citizens begin to ask whether justice is truly independent or politically aligned.
- Democracy does not collapse overnight. It erodes gradually through legal amendments, institutional pressure, and the quiet weakening of oversight bodies.
- Speaking in Geneva, journalist and activist Blessed Mhlanga warned about this steady erosion of democratic space. His message was blunt: “When leaders begin to fear the ballot, they begin to change the rules.”
He added a sharper line that resonated with many in the diaspora: “A constitution must restrain power not protect it.”
Zimbabwe’s 2013 Constitution was meant to prevent the concentration of authority that defined earlier decades. It was designed as a reset a contract between the state and its citizens. If that contract is now being adjusted in ways that disproportionately benefit those already in power, then the issue is not technical reform. It is democratic regression. The implications stretch beyond Zimbabwe’s borders. Millions in the diaspora whose remittances sustain families and institutions back home remain politically marginalised. Their financial contributions are welcomed, but their political voice remains limited.
History shows that when ruling parties reshape constitutions while questions swirl around institutional independence, confidence in governance declines both domestically and internationally.
The question Zimbabwe now faces is simple:
Is the constitution being strengthened for future generations or reshaped for present leadership?
Because when institutions appear compromised, and when electoral power shifts away from the people, democracy stops being a system of accountability.
It becomes a system of control.
Nearly 46 years - time for a change
- Details
- Written by: John Burke
- Category: 45 Years
- Hits: 141
The latest Zanu PF Mafia rigging revolves around rewriting the 2013 Constitution - itself a compromise!
BUT here is a brand new citizen oriented Constitution:
LINK to Constitution Document
The comprehensive constitutional framework combining US separation of powers with UK parliamentary traditions, including term limits, independent electoral commission with international oversight, transitional justice for Gukurahundi, and devolution. These two documents work together:
The Constitution provides the complete framework, while the Briefing specifically addresses the Politburo problem as identified as Zimbabwe's most critical governance failure.
Both are professionally formatted and ready for your UK-based international advocacy campaign.
Alternations to the Constitution can only be sanctioned by:
A two-thirds vote of both houses of Parliament, AND Approval by a majority of voters in a National Referendum
1. Politburo Problem Briefing (NEW - addresses your concern) L
This 10-page briefing document specifically tackles Zimbabwe's confused governance structure with its three incompatible systems. It includes:
The Problem Analysis:
- How the Zanu PF Politburo makes the REAL decisions while Parliament and Senate are rubber stamps
- Five specific ways the Politburo usurps constitutional governance (policy decisions, parliamentary control, appointments, budget allocation, electoral manipulation)
Constitutional Solutions:
- Complete Article II provisions for the main constitution that absolutely prohibit parallel governance structures
- Criminal penalties (10+ years imprisonment) for anyone participating in politburo governmental decision-making
- Transparency requirements for all government decisions
- Clear separation of party and state resources
- Unamendable status to prevent future erosion
Clarification of Roles:
- Distinct functions of the National Assembly (250 MPs) vs. Senate (80 members)
- How to ensure both are independent of party control
Transnational Repression
- Details
- Written by: Blessing Tariro Makeyi
- Category: Human Rights Violations
- Hits: 105
Is South Africa Turning a Blind Eye?
Transnational Repression and the Shadow War Against Zimbabwean Dissent
The assassination of 26-year-old activist Kudzai Weston Saruwaka in Pretoria on February 7, 2026—just one day after the death of opposition figure Blessing Geza—has thrust an uncomfortable question into South Africa's political consciousness: Has the Rainbow Nation become a hunting ground for foreign regimes seeking to silence their critics?
Saruwaka's killing, the suspicious arrest of opposition leader Job Sikhala with planted explosives, and the prolonged detention of Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC) leader Jameson Timba paint a disturbing picture of systematic transnational repression operating with apparent impunity on South African soil. The evidence suggests that while Pretoria may not be actively orchestrating these acts, it is creating conditions where such operations can flourish—through institutional weakness, political calculations, and what amounts to willful blindness.
The Saruwaka Assassination: A Professional Hit on South African Soil
Kudzai Weston Saruwaka was not a high-profile politician. He was a young activist who had supported Blessing Geza's calls for political change in Zimbabwe. That support cost him his life. On February 7, 2026, Saruwaka was found dead with gunshot wounds in Mabopane, Pretoria.
The circumstances bear all the hallmarks of an extraterritorial assassination:
- *The Setup*: Saruwaka, who ran a small business, was allegedly lured by a client who placed a R27,000 order, paid in installments. The final payment required him to travel to a remote location in Mabopane.
- *The Execution*: When Saruwaka arrived at the location, gunmen ambushed his vehicle. Both he and his Uber driver were shot dead.
- *The Signature*: Nothing was stolen—not the merchandise, not cash, nothing. Family members emphasize this point: "nothing, including the merchandise, was stolen," raising immediate suspicions that he was deliberately targeted and lured to the location for assassination.
- *The Timing*: Saruwaka was killed exactly one day after Blessing Geza's death from cancer in South Africa. The proximity is either an extraordinary coincidence or a calculated message.
- *The Context*: Saruwaka had fled Zimbabwe in October 2025 after receiving credible threats linked to his activism. He sought safety in South Africa. That safety proved illusory.
Opposition leader Douglas Mwonzora described Saruwaka as "one of the most gifted, fearless and focused young people" and called his death "murder most foul." Former MP Gladys Hlatywayo was more direct: the killing bore "the footprints of an extraterritorial assassination."
Page 1 of 17